![Picture](/uploads/2/1/9/0/21903072/4902656.jpg?168)
Jobs
Rating: 2/4
You kind of get the feeling that the only reason that the producers decided to cast Ashton Kutcher in this was because he looks exactly like Steve Jobs did back in the 1974. Which, actually he does because if you Google a picture of Steve Jobs when he was young then you'd be surprised because when you see the pictures that come up you'd think that's no way that's young Steve Jobs. While Kutcher may, actually does and did a not so bad job (no pun intended) portraying, Steve Jobs back in 1974, the Film "Jobs" itself feels a bit underdeveloped because a lot of this Film feels too over dramatic and knowing of itself.
I'm not sure if this is true or not (trying not to mess with history and the facts), but Steve Jobs alone in this was kind of an Jerk in this Film. In pretty much every scene in this Film he's seen firing, yelling, and insulting people. So, Kutcher, or Steve Jobs, in this isn't even likable. If you make one of these bio-Films you at least have make the audience care and feel empathy for him or her even if the Film is about someone who did something like kill someone or committed grand theft. Basically, you have to make the audience actually care about what the person is going through. In "Jobs" however, he's (Steve Jobs/Ashton Kutcher) is the meanest person there. Now, again, I may be incorrect with what i'm writing because maybe Steve Jobs in real life was like this and they wanted to show you how Jobs really acted like back then. But still you never know what happened back then.....
Another thing about "Jobs" is that whoever wrote this Film wrote in the most tackiest and corniest way possible because everyone in this Film, even Steve Jobs/Ashton Kutcher talk in the worst, most cliched written ways possible. Everyone talks as if there were making this Film for seven or eight. Even so, you can't even take this Film seriously because of that and they fact that when you see this Film you kind of find it hard to believe that any of this really happened. "Jobs" is pretty much if a screenwriter like Skip Woods (the awful "A Good Day to Die Hard") decided to write "The Social Network" back in 2010. Speaking of "The Social Network" real screenwriter Aaron Sorkin is in talks about making another Steve Jobs Film based on his own screenplay. So maybe that'll make up for this Film.
So, while this Film may seem well, it ultimately feels underdeveloped because even Ashton Kutcher really was not THAT BAD portraying the late Steve Jobs, "Jobs" feels as if someone must have just rushed through telling Steve's story and filled it with corny, very bad dialogue along with making our main protagonist unlikable in the worst ways possible. Let's just hope that Sorkin will make up for this Film in about two or three years from now.
Rating: 2/4
You kind of get the feeling that the only reason that the producers decided to cast Ashton Kutcher in this was because he looks exactly like Steve Jobs did back in the 1974. Which, actually he does because if you Google a picture of Steve Jobs when he was young then you'd be surprised because when you see the pictures that come up you'd think that's no way that's young Steve Jobs. While Kutcher may, actually does and did a not so bad job (no pun intended) portraying, Steve Jobs back in 1974, the Film "Jobs" itself feels a bit underdeveloped because a lot of this Film feels too over dramatic and knowing of itself.
I'm not sure if this is true or not (trying not to mess with history and the facts), but Steve Jobs alone in this was kind of an Jerk in this Film. In pretty much every scene in this Film he's seen firing, yelling, and insulting people. So, Kutcher, or Steve Jobs, in this isn't even likable. If you make one of these bio-Films you at least have make the audience care and feel empathy for him or her even if the Film is about someone who did something like kill someone or committed grand theft. Basically, you have to make the audience actually care about what the person is going through. In "Jobs" however, he's (Steve Jobs/Ashton Kutcher) is the meanest person there. Now, again, I may be incorrect with what i'm writing because maybe Steve Jobs in real life was like this and they wanted to show you how Jobs really acted like back then. But still you never know what happened back then.....
Another thing about "Jobs" is that whoever wrote this Film wrote in the most tackiest and corniest way possible because everyone in this Film, even Steve Jobs/Ashton Kutcher talk in the worst, most cliched written ways possible. Everyone talks as if there were making this Film for seven or eight. Even so, you can't even take this Film seriously because of that and they fact that when you see this Film you kind of find it hard to believe that any of this really happened. "Jobs" is pretty much if a screenwriter like Skip Woods (the awful "A Good Day to Die Hard") decided to write "The Social Network" back in 2010. Speaking of "The Social Network" real screenwriter Aaron Sorkin is in talks about making another Steve Jobs Film based on his own screenplay. So maybe that'll make up for this Film.
So, while this Film may seem well, it ultimately feels underdeveloped because even Ashton Kutcher really was not THAT BAD portraying the late Steve Jobs, "Jobs" feels as if someone must have just rushed through telling Steve's story and filled it with corny, very bad dialogue along with making our main protagonist unlikable in the worst ways possible. Let's just hope that Sorkin will make up for this Film in about two or three years from now.